[ad_1]
Last Updated:
With the 3090 being such an expensive option, we look at the cards that follow with the comparison of the 6900 XT vs 3080. A duo of likely fan favorites with a lower cost but likely plenty of performance for all games and resolutions.
Both of these came out with their respective series, and have been the staple of the lineups for most people. Competing for the title of the best graphics card, they offer a great choice from both AMD and Nvidia. We take a closer look at which option is better for you.
ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC 16GB
Pros
Axial-tech fan design has been enhanced
GPU Tweak II provides intuitive performance tweaking, thermal controls, and system monitoring
ASUS ROG Strix NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 OC Edition
Pros
The building blocks for the world’s fastest, most efficient GPU
Architecture
Being from the two different GPU manufacturers there is a lot of variation between how they are made. AMD’s card is built upon the RDNA 2.0 architecture and in particular, the 6900 XT uses the NAVI 21 XTX GPU. It is built with TSMCs 7nm process making the die 520mm2. While also made up of 26.8 billion transistors.
On the other hand, Nvidia has the Ampere die architecture. The 3080 is built with the GA102 particular GPU that is made with Samsungs 8nm process. Packing in the die to a size of 628mm2 with 28.3 billion transistors. Giving it a much bigger die than the 6900 XT as it makes up for the bigger transistors and fits more into it.
Specifications
| RX 6900 XT | RTX 3080 | |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Navi 21 XTX(215-121000167) | GA102-200-KD-A1 |
| Shaders | 5120 | 8704 |
| RT Cores | 80 | 68 |
| TMUs | 320 | 272 |
| Memory | 16GB GDDR6 | 10GB GDDR6X |
| Base clock | 1825 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Boost clock | 2250 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Memory clock | 16 Gbps | 19 Gbps |
| Card bus | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
| TDP | 300W | 320W |
Comparing the 6900 XT vs 3080 we take a look at what the graphics cards are made of. On the base level, they do have different architectures and so looking at their specification may not be a one-to-one comparison. But it does give us a good idea, so we will look at some specific specifications.
TDP
Firstly, we take a look at the thermal design power of the two GPUs. This count tells us how much power the die can consume at the maximum power. This also informs us of how much heat the card will produce. A factor to consider when you’re looking at overclocking, thinking of cooling your GPU, or just how much it will cost to power it.
Comparing these two cards, it’s the 6900 XT with a lower TDP. It maxes out at 300W, 20W lower than the 3080. Showing it will stay cooler and consume less power to achieve its performance, is potentially a big factor when considering which one to pick.
VRAM
The video memory of a GPU is the frame buffer between the card and CPU as well as storage for texture maps. An important feature when considering large resolutions and multiple screens. As it reduces latency and buffering with the ever-growing demand of pixel counts.
Comparing the 6900 XT vs 3080 there is a difference in both types of memory and size. AMD goes for the size count rather than speeds. The 6900 XT has 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM, so plenty of capacity but with a clock rate of 17 Gbps and bandwidth of 512GB/s.
Whereas, Nvidia opts for speed. The 3080 has 10GB of GDDR6X, which has a clock rate of 19Gbps putting its bandwidth at 760.3GB/s. Both of which may have different effects on performance.
Clock rate
Clock speed of a card is determined by how quickly the silicon crystal can cyle. This cycling processes graphical instructions that output the graphical goodness you need. Whilst, not a direct show of performance it can be a good indicator. Especially when you try to get the most out of a GPU with overclocking.
Again as previously seen, AMD gains an advantage in clock speed over Nvidia. The 6900 XT is factory clocked to a 1826MHz base clock and a 2250MHz boost clock. Compared to the 3080s 1440MHz base and 1710MHz boost. Offering a slight advantage to team red.
GPU die cores
The cores are the different processing units within a GPU. They have different specializations, and in our closer look, we have shaders, RT, and TMUs. These focus on showing and shading scenes, real-time ray tracing, and creating 3d textures from bitmaps.
Comparing the 6900 XT vs 3080, the RTX card takes advantage of the shader count but loses in RT cores and TMUs. Potentially leading to lower performance in some areas.
RX 6900 XT vs RTX 3080 Performance
Taking a look at 3dmark benchmarks we can see the direct graphic performance of the graphic cards. And it’s the 6900 XT that leads in this situation, in fact, it takes first place in the benchmark with a score of 20,352. Whereas, The 3080 is only in 8th with a score of 17,650.
In other scenarios though it is a very close call. With the 3080 having a slightly higher effective speed. But in gaming, they tend to trade blows with the performance being very similar. However, ray tracing is where Nvidia still takes the crown and gives the 3080 the edge in those scenarios.
Price comparison
The launch price for the 6900 XT is $999, but the 3080 is much cheaper at $699. Which is a significant difference at $300. The 43% price difference can be quite a turnoff from choosing the AMD card, especially with the performance similarity.
However, in the current expensive GPU market, it is unlikely that you can buy a graphics card at MSRP. And checking these two, we find that PCPartPicker shows the cheapest 3080 at $1798, compared to the 6900 XT at $1260. So massively cheaper to get the AMD card.
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB GDDR6 Graphics Card
Pros
Tri-fan cooling system prevents overheating and throttling
Impressive base and boost clock speeds
AMD Fidelity FX boosts display brilliance
Radeon Anti-Lag tech eliminates lag
Super fast in lower resolutions
Infinity cache offers enhanced efficiency
Cons
Not quite as good for intensive parallel creative workflows
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING OC 10G
Pros
Efficient cooling solution
High out-the-box clock boost
Greater expected lifespan
Conclusion
Comparing 6900 XT vs 3080 on MSRP it is hard to justify the 6900 XT in terms of performance. With similar FPS but losing out in ray tracing it doesn’t make sense, especially with Nvidias software solutions. However, in the current market, the AMD card is cheaper so may be better to afford at the time. Although time may be your friend, with current GPU prices falling and the new RTX 4000 series around the corner.
Share this article…
[ad_2]
